Orchestrator
The Orchestrator — Jarvis
Section titled “The Orchestrator — Jarvis”Jarvis is the central intelligence of Assemble. Like Tony Stark’s AI assistant, Jarvis doesn’t do the work — he figures out who should do it, when, in what order, and with what context.
How Jarvis works
Section titled “How Jarvis works”Every request goes through Jarvis first. His process:
- Receive the user’s request
- Classify the domain (dev, marketing, SEO, product, security, ops…)
- Assess complexity (TRIVIAL, MODERATE, or COMPLEX)
- Match a workflow or compose an ad-hoc one
- Execute — activate agents sequentially with context injection
- Verify — check that each agent produced their expected outputs
- Report — deliver a summary with all deliverables
Complexity assessment
Section titled “Complexity assessment”Jarvis evaluates every request against three complexity levels:
TRIVIAL
Section titled “TRIVIAL”- Simple question or single-domain task
- One agent suffices
- Direct answer, no formal workflow
Example: “What’s the best way to handle auth tokens?”
Route: @bruce-banner answers directly.
MODERATE
Section titled “MODERATE”- Clear task spanning 2-3 agents
- No formal spec needed
- Sequential execution with deliverables
Example: “/bugfix the search endpoint returns stale results”
Route: @bruce-banner diagnoses + fixes, @hawkeye writes regression test.
COMPLEX
Section titled “COMPLEX”- Multi-domain, high-stakes, or ambitious task
- Requires specification, planning, and task breakdown
- Applies the Spec-Driven methodology
Example: “/feature add real-time collaborative editing” Route: Full Spec-Driven flow (see below).
The Spec-Driven methodology
Section titled “The Spec-Driven methodology”For COMPLEX tasks, Jarvis enforces a structured 5-phase approach:
Phase 1 — SPECIFY (@professor-x)
Section titled “Phase 1 — SPECIFY (@professor-x)”Produces spec.md containing:
- Objective and success criteria
- Constraints and assumptions
- User stories and acceptance criteria
- Out-of-scope items
User validation required before proceeding.
Phase 2 — PLAN (@tony-stark)
Section titled “Phase 2 — PLAN (@tony-stark)”Produces plan.md containing:
- Architecture decisions
- Technical choices with rationale
- Agents involved and their sequence
- Risk assessment
User validation required before proceeding.
Phase 3 — TASKS (@captain-america)
Section titled “Phase 3 — TASKS (@captain-america)”Produces tasks.md containing:
- Task breakdown with estimates
- Dependencies between tasks
- Priority ordering
- Acceptance criteria per task
User validation required before proceeding.
Phase 4 — IMPLEMENT (Board Execution)
Section titled “Phase 4 — IMPLEMENT (Board Execution)”For COMPLEX workflows, Captain America turns tasks.md into _board.yaml, then the Board Execution engine runs tickets in parallel through implement → review → test → done.
Key properties:
- Automatic WIP limits keep implementation, review, and test stages balanced
- Dependency resolution ensures blocked tickets wait until upstream work is
done - Ticket-specific context injection keeps each agent focused on its own scope and acceptance criteria
- Simpler workflows can still stay on the linear implementation path when a board would add unnecessary overhead
See the Board Execution reference for the full board format and execution rules.
Phase 5 — CLOSE (Jarvis)
Section titled “Phase 5 — CLOSE (Jarvis)”Produces _quality.md with:
- What was delivered
- What was validated
- Remaining risks
- Lessons learned
Routing intelligence
Section titled “Routing intelligence”Jarvis uses keyword matching and domain classification to route requests:
| Keywords | Agent | Domain |
|---|---|---|
| API, backend, server, endpoint | @bruce-banner | Backend |
| UI, frontend, React, components | @spider-man | Frontend |
| test, QA, regression, E2E | @hawkeye | Testing |
| security, vulnerability, audit | @punisher | Security |
| SEO, crawl, indexation | @black-widow | Technical SEO |
| campaign, marketing, GTM | @star-lord | Marketing |
| architecture, scalability | @tony-stark | Architecture |
The full routing table covers all 34 agents. When keywords overlap, Jarvis selects the most relevant agent based on the full context.
Context injection
Section titled “Context injection”Before each agent works, Jarvis injects context:
- Workflow context: which workflow, which step (N/total), what comes before and after
- Input files: deliverables from previous steps that the agent should read
- Expected outputs: what files the agent must produce
- Constraints: stay consistent with previous agents’ work, don’t repeat
This ensures agents build on each other’s work rather than starting from scratch.
The manifest
Section titled “The manifest”During workflow execution, Jarvis maintains _manifest.yaml:
workflow: feature-developmentstarted: 2026-03-21T10:00:00Zstatus: in_progress
steps: - id: spec agent: professor-x status: completed started: 2026-03-21T10:00:00Z completed: 2026-03-21T10:02:30Z outputs: - spec.md
- id: plan agent: tony-stark status: in_progress started: 2026-03-21T10:02:35Z outputs: []This is the source of truth for the workflow’s state.